Intervention modes
Work
I do not operate as a service catalog. Every engagement starts by clarifying the right mode: understand the system, make an architecture decision, advise a CTO, or build via Omnivya Expert.
Diagnose
Make the system, its dependencies, risks and constraints visible.
Scope examples
- systems and cloud architecture
- Kubernetes and Platform Engineering
- observability, reliability and operability
- DevSecOps and software supply chain
- dependencies and technical risk
- governance and decision flows
Possible deliverables
- system model
- prioritized risks
- required decisions
- roadmap
- executable action plan
Starting situation
The system became opaque: no one can explain dependencies, prioritize risk, or connect technical choices to real constraints.
Expected outcome
A shared representation of the system, prioritized risks and an action plan the organization can execute — without unsourced numeric promises.
Engagement shape
Focused assessment: interviews, architecture review, dependency and decision-flow mapping. Scope and duration calibrated to context.
What is included
- System and dependency mapping
- Risk and constraint analysis
- Prioritized decision backlog
- Roadmap and action plan
- Stakeholder readout
What is not included
- Implementation or technical delivery
- Tool procurement or deployment
- Staff augmentation without an architecture frame
- Commercial metrics or unverified gain figures
Associated proofs
- External Metrics ExporterOpen
Projet open source qui découvre les dépendances externes des workloads Kubernetes et expose un contrat Prometheus neutre vis-à-vis des fournisseurs.
Decide
Help leaders and technical owners make a difficult decision with sufficient evidence.
Scope examples
- cloud or Kubernetes architecture choice
- internal platform strategy
- cloud migration or technical transformation
- build versus buy
- system decomposition
- security / DevSecOps roadmap
- CTO advisory on a structural decision
Starting situation
A structural decision blocks the organization: multiple options, little evidence, and poorly understood cost of change.
Expected outcome
A documented decision with explicit trade-offs, selection criteria and sufficient evidence to engage the organization.
Engagement shape
Decision workshop and options analysis: ADR, criteria, scenarios and reasoned recommendation. Calibrated to stakes, without imposed fixed duration.
What is included
- Structured options analysis
- ADR-style documentation
- Decision criteria and trade-offs
- Reasoned recommendation
- Next-steps plan
What is not included
- Delivery of the chosen solution
- Commercial negotiation with vendors
- ROI promises or gain percentages
- Formal regulatory validation (unless explicitly scoped)
Associated proofs
- Azure Devops & MegaLinter Auto PRRead
Autofix your code using Azure DevOps & MegaLinter !
Build
Turn the decision into an operational system with Omnivya Expert.
Scope examples
- cloud / Kubernetes platform foundations
- GitOps and delivery automation
- observability and reliability
- supply chain security (DevSecOps)
- internal platform components and tools
- technical prototypes framed by a prior decision
Starting situation
The direction is set but the system does not exist yet — or legacy prevents execution. An entity capable of building without losing the decision frame is needed.
Expected outcome
An operational, governable and documented system — platform, product or component — delivered via Omnivya Expert with traceability of choices.
Engagement shape
Structured delivery via Omnivya Expert: foundations, automation, security and operability integrated from the start. Scope defined from a prior decision or diagnosis.
What is included
- Technical execution via Omnivya Expert
- Platform, GitOps, observability per scope
- Supply chain security integrated into delivery
- Documentation and skills transfer
- Alignment with published principles and documented decisions
What is not included
- Engagement without prior decision or diagnosis (except express scoping)
- Uptime promises or SLAs not contractually defined
- Pure staff augmentation without platform ownership
- Invented success metrics
Associated proofs
- External Metrics ExporterOpen
Projet open source qui découvre les dépendances externes des workloads Kubernetes et expose un contrat Prometheus neutre vis-à-vis des fournisseurs.
- De la métrique au runbook : construire des alertes réellement opérablesRead
Une alerte est un contrat d’exploitation testable : six maillons relient le phénomène réel au runbook, et versionner du YAML n’en prouve aucun.
Speaking and advisory
One-off interventions: conferences, panels, targeted training or short advisory (architecture, platform, DevSecOps).
- Keynotes and workshops on documented topics
- Short advisory or CTO accompaniment on a specific topic
- No commercial catalog or mass intake form